Right to Recall Alliance & Jury System Alliance

We are the Group of people who truly believe in Right to Recall and Jury System. Our mission is to join all groups, parties and people together to enable these laws in India..

Why Right to Recall and Jury System is important.

Jury System is the indirect way of Right to Recall, where citizens can replace government employees through court, while through Right to Recall they can do it directly without going into courte.

Right to Recall

Right to Recall means procedures by which citizens can expel/replace PM, CM, judges, Police Chief etc. This system came in US in 1800 AD. Today, corruption in US police and courts is much less than India. And the only reason is that citizens in US have procedures by which they can replace Governors, Police Chief, judges, Govt lawyers etc. In Europe, Karl Marx had demanded Right to Recall in 1871. In India, 1946 M N Roy in his book "Draft Constitution of India" had put utmost emphasis on Right to Recall. M N Roy had said that that election alone without recall is of no use. Between 1960-77, Jayprakash Narayan demanded Right To Recall 100s of times. The 1977 Janata Party manifesto by which Advaniji and Vajpayeeji became Minister for the first time had promise of implementing the Right to Recall.

Many problems of India are because we citizens cant expel PM, CM, judges, Police Chief etc. eg :

[1] In 2008, Jammu agitated for 6 months, Why? Because the plot given to Amarnath temple was taken back. Why did he dare to take back the land? Because we citizens of India dont have procedure to expel/replace PM
[2] In 2008, two kids in Asaram's Ashram died. In Shilaj, a rich car owner killed 3 men in a hit and run. In both cases, the police ruined the investigation. Why did they dare to do so? Because we citizens dont have procedures to expel District Police Chiefs and we dont have procedures to stop his transfers.
[3] How could our MP dare to praise Jinhah? Because we citizens of Ahmedabad dont have procedure to expel MP.
[4] Why didn't Vajpayee in 1996 rename Ahmedabad to Karnavati? Because we didn't have procedure to expel MP.
 
We request all voters to ask BJP, Congress, independents etc to state whether they support Right to Recall PM, CM, judges or whether they oppose Right to Recall PM, CM , judges? If a candidate opposes Right to Recall, he is insulting all us citizens, insulting democracy. Recall is the only tool against corruption. So opposing recall is supporting corruption. Voting for an anti-recall candidate is asking for 5 years of slavery. And if a candidate says that he is pro-recall, then please ask him to provide the drafts by which citizens can replace PM, CMs, SCjs, District Police Chief etc. If the candidate does not provide the drafts, please do not trust him. Many intellectuals are saying that the drafts we have proposed are unconstitutional. Its a lie - our drafts are 100% constitutional.

You can check following link for detailed information about Right to Recall.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recall_election

Jury System

In Jury, random numbers of people are selected from General Citizens and they play a role of Judge. People are randomly selected so there is less chance of corruption.

Consider India. We have 110 cr citizens. We are bound to have at least 20 lakhs to 50 lakhs disputes a year. If these disputes are not resolved by the citizens in short time, the individuals will resolve to private violence thereby causing a chaos. Such chaos could wreck the nation. So for stability, it becomes necessary for the citizenry to give judgments on these disputes, and use force to enforce that judgment. It is not possible for every citizen to personally take interest in each of the these lakhs of disputes. A citizen can at best take interest in 2-5 disputes a year. Therefore, the citizenry has not much option, but to appoint some individuals, for each dispute and take their decision has almost final in most cases, and scrutinize (via appeal) them in some cases. So one of the procedure that a nation has to execute, implicitly or explicitly, is to choose individuals to give judgment on a particular dispute. There are two broad systems depending on how individuals are chosen

1. The Jury System: Given any dispute, 10, 12 or 15 citizens are chosen at random from the voter list of all adult citizens in that district, state or nation and these citizens, called as Jurors, hear the arguments, examine the evidences, and give a verdict, EG in India before 1956, many cases were resolved by 12 citizens chosen at random
2. The judge system : the Govt appoints some 200-2000 individuals per crore of population in nation as judges, who will have term for 20-35 years. And these fixed small number of appointed individuals will resolve the disputes. EG in India, cases are resolved by about 13000 judges and some 5000 tribunals.

In Judge System, Small number of Individuals, say 20,000 to 100,000 individuals in India would decide all the cases 20 - 25 lakhs cases a year in India. In the Jury System, EACH case goes to 12-15 different Jurors, randomly chosen from the district, state or nation. The 20-25 lakh cases will be resolved by 3 cr citizens.

Many cases go same individuals. One judge in his career will hear some 500 to 200,000 cases and give some 5000 to 50,000 verdicts. The Jurors change with every case. A citizen cannot become Juror against for at least 5 years.

If a District gets 5000 cases a year, and say 25000 cases in 5 years, in the judge system they will be resolved by some 25-50 judges. In Jury System, they will be resolved by 300,000 to 400,000 different citizens.

In Judge System, corruption is very easy for Judges. In Jury System, corruption is very difficult amongst Jury.

Why we need to fix the courts and bring Jury System

This is change is needed to restore the Indian Constitution, and the subversions that have occurred in past several years. When the citizens wrote the Constitution in 1951, it was clearly stated by the citizens to MPs, SCjs, IAS etc

1. The country will be run as per the Constitution
2. The country will be run as per the Constitution, as interpreted by the citizens of India
3. The SCjs’ interpretation of Constitution will be above Ministers’ interpretation of the Constitution, but citizens’ interpretation of the Constitution will be final and supreme.

It was because of these decisions, the citizens kept the words Democracy, political justice and equality in the Preamble. And this was the reason why MPs , who were supposed to represent the citizens, were given powers to impeach the SCjs, so that if and when SCjs interpret the Constitution differently from the citizens, the MPs can impeach the SCjs. India’s Constitution borrows many ideas from US Constitution and US society. The citizens in 1950 when they wrote Constitution of India had taken the meaning of word Democracy that was prevailing in US. What was the meaning of word Democracy in US? To understand that, one should read the Constitutions of US states. eg Maryland Constitution clearly says that “Jurors (i.e. common citizens) shall interpret the laws as well as the facts”. The Constitution of 20 more US states speak the same. And so does US Supreme Court. IOW, the word Democracy clearly meant a regime where citizens make the laws and citizens interpret the laws as well as facts in a case.

The Constitution has now been torn apart in High Courts and Supreme Courts. I will quote following example :

http://www.boloji.com/wfs2/wfs238.htm

Fun Place for Sex Crimes

The [Marty] couple [Pedophiles, Wilhelm (61) and Lily Marty (58)] had been arrested in December 2000 after they were caught red-handed while photographing minor girls picked up from the Gateway of India. The horror story of child sexual abuse by the Swiss couple was told in-camera to a sessions court in Mumbai. And in March 2003, Additional Sessions Judge Mridula Bhatkar convicted the couple. They were awarded a sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment .... It was on their appeal against this conviction that the Mumbai High Court accepted their contention that if the matter was not expedited, the appeal would not be heard until after seven years, the term of their original sentence. The judge also directed them to pay an enhanced compensation of Rs 100,000 to each of the victims. The gravity of their offence did not figure anywhere in the judgment.

Their passports revealed that the couple had been visiting India every year since 1989. They operated in different countries and their laptop was stocked with photographs of children including those from Sri Lanka and the Philippines. Posing as a lonely, grandfatherly couple, they befriended street children and their parents, promising to give them a good time on the pretext of charity. Marty (who described himself as a general manager in a multinational pharmaceutical company) and his wife were well stocked with lubricants, condoms and penile sprays. Lily Marty, a trained nurse, would tend to the wounds the children suffered as a result of their abuse. ... But none of this, all recorded evidence, figured in the judgment of the Mumbai High Court. The SC Bench headed by Chief Justice V N Khare granted bail to the two in an order passed on April 5, 2004 ... .

After obtaining bail from CjI Khare, the two wealthy Swiss pedophiles escaped from India. Such bail orders lower the morale of policemen and lower courts. The acquittal order given by Mumbai High Court judge was against the Constitution. and the bail order given by Chief judge Khare to the two wealthy Swiss convicted pedophiles was also blatant violation of the Constitution.

Global overview of Jury System

There are about 17 countries which use Jury System – Canada, US, UK, France, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand. Two countries are added in this list --- some 25% of Russia’s Districts now uses Jury System and Japan will start Jury System from 2009. And some 90 countries use judge system. Each and every country which uses judge system have corrupt courts, corrupt police and corrupt polity ( 4 exceptions are Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Israel, where corruption is much higher than the 15 countries which have Jury System). Russia and Japan too had to move to Jury System due to problem of corruption and nepotism in courts. And so did South Korea in Apr-2008. IOW, if there is anything that shows 100% correlation, it is that Jury System always reduces corruption and judge system always increases corruption and nepotism.

We propose following changes to improve India.

1. Enabling citizens to replace the Supreme Court Chief Judge
2. Enabling citizens to replace the four senior Supreme Court judges
3. Enabling citizens to replace the High Court Chief Judge
4. Enabling citizens to replace the four senior High Court judges
5. Enabling citizens to replace the Lower Court Chief judge
6. Enabling citizens to replace the four senior most Lower Court judges
7. Recruitment of all junior Lower Court judges by written exams only (no interviews)
8. Recruitment of all junior High Court judges by written exams only (no interviews)
9. Recruitment of all junior Supreme Court judges by seniority only (no interviews)
10. Jury System in Lower Courts to decide punishments
11. Jury System in High Courts for appeals
12. Jury System to Supreme Courts for appeals
13. Enacting National ID system (to improve records in courts)
14. Enact a wealth tax of 0.5% of market value of non-agricultural land above 100 sq meters per person, and use that fund on Police, Courts only.
15. Create 100,000 more Lower Courts
16. Jury System to expel/fine a state govt employee.
17. Jury System to expel/fine a central govt employee.
18. Enabling citizens to replace Chief National Prosecutors
19. Enabling citizens to replace four senior most National Prosecutors
20. Enabling citizens to replace Chief State Prosecutor
21. Enabling citizens to replace four senior most State Prosecutors
22. Enabling citizens to replace Chief District Prosecutor
23. Enabling citizens to replace four senior most District Prosecutors
24. Recruitment of junior District prosecutors by written exams only (no interviews)
25. Recruitment of junior State prosecutors by written exams only (no interviews)
26. Recruitment of National prosecutors by seniority only (no interviews)
27. Teaching Law from class-VI
28. Teaching law to all adults for free
29. Wealth disclosure of all Govt Employees and their close relatives, their trusts , companies
30. Disclosure of residency and citizen status of all Govt Employees and their close relatives
31. All courts records, as far as possible, will be placed on internet
32. The parties will be informed about their case status by emails, SMS in all languages, along with usual postal mails and notices.
33. Every time there is a trial, 20 citizens chosen at random will be required to attend the trial (to increase awareness about courts in citizenry)

Nepotism or cross-nepotism Judge system

To end nepotism, in judge system, a judge’s relative is banned from practicing in the judge’s courts. Now the intellectuals insist that we must accept that this ban end nepotism in courts. Well, this does not make any difference at all. In most court complexes, two or more judges will form a cartel. judge-A will give favorable treatment to relative lawyers of judge-B and judge-B will give favorable treatment to the relative lawyers of judge-A. This is what call as  cross-nepotism . Till date, every intellectual we met is hostile to even discuss the problem, of cross nepotism in courts. And till, Jury System is the only known solution to this problem of cross-nepotism in courts. The cross nepotism has become so intense that criminals and industrialist just retain a few relative lawyers and get all favorable judgments and commons simply get crushed in the courts.

Cross nepotism is important reason why Acts like SEZs did not get canceled in High and Supreme Courts.

Even if culture is nepotic, nepotism and cross-nepotism is structurally impossible in Jury System. It is similar to recruitment by written exams, where nepotism cant make any difference. In Jury System, 12 Jurors are chosen from population of 5 lakhs to 100 crores. Since these Jurors have only one case, the case is over 5 to 15 days in 99% cases. So first, it is highly unlikely that a lawyer would exist in world who would have be a relative of these 12 Jurors or even 6 of them or even two of the Jurors. And finding him within 15 days make it further difficult. India sees some 35,00,000 cases a year spread over about 700 district i.e. about 5000 cases a district a year. If these 5000 cases are resolved by 5000 batches of 12 Jurors each, then less than 10 batches will have a two Jurors with common relative lawyers. Further, in Jury System, a lawyer would face prison sentence if he appears before a Jury where in he has a close relative. So nepotism is physically impossible in Jury System. Now can cross-nepotism work in Jury System?

So only way cross-nepotism will work is when 12 Jurors of Jury-A and 12 different Jurors of Jury-B form nexuses. Jury-A would favor lawyer with relatives in Jury-B and Jury-B will favor lawyer who has relative in Jury-A. Finding such pair of lawyers, pair of Juries and managing deal within 5 to 15 days is a mathematical impossibility. IOW, while the judge system reeks with nepotism and cross-nepotism, the Jury System is immune to nepotism and cross-nepotism.

How career crime increases in judge system due to cross-nepotism

Consider a specific kind of crime --- street criminals (commonly called as Bhaai or Daadaa) or any career criminals who collect protection money from small shop-keepers etc every month, openly and fearlessly. There are places in US/Europe with high crimes, but nowhere can one see criminals openly extorting money from shop-keepers. One of the factor why career crime is rampant in India, and less seen in West is the that India uses judge system, while the West uses Jury System. The judge system makes India's courts very nexused, while the Jury System has drastically reduced the nexusproneness in Western courts.

Lets see how Jury System reduces the nexusproneness in Western Courts. Consider a mid-level career criminal with a gang of 50-100 criminals. He may be operating in some 5-10 areas. Now to sustain their operations, he and his gang members would need to pay monthly bribes to many MLAs, MPs, police officers, other officers, government lawyers, judges etc and would also need money to hire lawyers, mercenaries etc on time to time basis. All this, means a monthly FIXED COST of lakhs of rupees. Now such career criminal CAN NOT always find 5-10 victims that would cover all the costs and give profits every month. So almost always, a gang of career criminals has to victimize 100s of victims a month. In short, a career criminal and his gang-member has to commit 100s of crime a month. Out of so many crimes, some 20-30 of victims would end up filing complain in the courts. This would generate some 300-400 court cases per year.

Career criminal in Judge system V/s Jury System

In the judge system, say 1000 cases that get filed in 4-5 years against that ganglord. All will go to just 5-10 judges. In the Jury System, EACH case goes to 12-15 DIFFERENT Jurors, randomly chosen from the district, state or nation so these 1000 cases will go to 12000 to 15000 district, state or nation.

So in order to delay the case to frustrate the witnesses or get outright acquittals, the gang leader has to cultivate nexuses with ONLY 5-10 judges. Long delay in Jury Trials are rare as each Jury is given ONLY one case, hearings are from 11am to 4pm on one and only one case, and mostly next date is next day. And the ganglord will have to make nexuses with 12000 Jurors.

If the ganglord manages to cultivate nexuses with 5-10 judges, and he can manage an acquittal/delay in 99% cases. So to get acquittals in 1000 cases in 5 years, the gang leader will need to cultivate nexuses with 12000 Jurors.

So managing acquittals in even 10%-20% cases in Jury System is next to impossible. IOW, since a large number of cases in Indian courts are resolved by a small number of individuals (i.e. judges) the career criminal have cultivated nexuses and are having a field day. While West uses a very large number of individuals to resolve court cases, which makes establishing nexuses in a larger number of cases difficult to the extent of impossible. So career crimes, such as extortion, in West have vanished.

Judge-Lawyer nexus in Judge system

That was about judge-criminal nexus. The courts in India are sprawling with judge-lawyer nexuses. The nexus between judges and relative lawyers is now a law than exception. But even apart from that, the judges have nexuses with many non-relative lawyers as well. How does judge-lawyer nexus come into existence? No one in Western courts has even seen Juror-lawyer nexus. The reasons are structural and not cultural.

Say 5 senior lawyers have 20 junior lawyers working for them. Say they are together taking say 1000 cases a 4 year period year in a district. In Jury System it is ditto.

Most of these cases would to some 20 judges posted in that district. The cases will go to 12,000 Jurors in a year.

One judge would get many cases from them. No Juror would get repeated.

Within 3-6 months these 5 lawyers can cultivate nexuses with these 10-20 judges. There is no time to cultivate nexuses with even 2% of them.
When a lawyer makes a nexus with a judge during the trial of a case, that nexus with that judge will be CERTAINLY useful to that lawyer in ALL his cases which will come up before that judge. Even if a lawyer manages to form nexuses with say 7-8 out of 12 Jurors during the trial of a case, those nexus with those Jurors will be of NO USE at all in ALL other case of that lawyer, as Jurors change with each and every trial.

How corruption reduces in Jury System

Much of the corruption in judge system is via organized criminals or large corporate who have 100s of cases in a state. These cases go to some 100-300 judges in lower courts. So these criminals and corporates hire some 15-50 lawyers who are close relatives of these judges or are otherwise close to these judges. Now in Jury System, these 100s of cases will go to 10000s of Jurors. eg if there are say 100 cases against a ganglord and his members or there 100 cases against a company in a state, these cases will go 12000 Jurors. A nation wide corporate would be having 1000 cases a year against it all over India and would end up confronting 12,000 Jurors a year all over India No ganglord or company owner is capable of bribing so many citizens. So they give up.

Further, in judge system, a judge has to keep a commitment after taking bribe or else he wont get repeat business. In the Jury System, the Jurors change with every case and a Juror cannot come back in Jury for next several years. So the bribe-giver has no assurance that Juror will keep the commitment, and very often, due to hatred against criminals, Jurors will still punish a person even if he has taken a bribe. After taking bribe, he has nothing to lose.

How corruption in police , administration reduces in Jury System

Most policemen , officers come into contact with judges due to years of services. Almost every policemen, officer knows which relative lawyer to contact if there is a case against him in a particular judge’s court. And they have years of relation and nexuses. The relative lawyers trade favors for the favors they would get from policemen, judges. And so policemen, officers get away in the cases against them easily. However, in Jury System. they confront Jurors who are angry against corrupt policemen, officers. And they have no nexus with 1000s of Jurors. So chances that a corrupt policemen, officer gets punished are far higher in Jury System. This is why Jury System reduces corruption in other depts such as police, revenue, education, health etc.

Historical overview of Jury System

Rome had elected Magistrates and used Jury System for high crimes, which created a far less nepotic and less corrupt regime than neighbors. This is why Rome became much stronger than the rest. Rome collapsed and main reason was that a large chunk of population (slaves) did not have right to vote. After that, in every regime, the punishment was given by King or Lords appointed by the King. In 1200 AD, Britain was the FIRST nation which reversed this --- and declared in Magna Carta that the King’s agents shall only make allegation and citizens (Jurors) would decide the guilt and punishment. This was a historical change , a change that diametrically changes relation between rulers and subjects. The ruler was no longer in charge of deciding imprisonment or even fines. It was after this Jury System, the craftsmen and traders could protect themselves from the arbitrary rule of Lords and progress started. It was only this reason, why craftsmen became prosperous in Britain and some of them later became industrialists. The industrial revolution in Britain was only because of this Jury System – the Jurors protected the craftsmen, traders and industrialists from the arbitrary fines of Lords and the Kings and enabled these craftsmen to become wealthy. The so called Renaissance had no role to play. If Renaissance was responsible for the progress UK made, well, why didn’t Italy made such progress, where Renaissance came first? The intellectuals have deliberately suppressed the role of Jury System in explaining why Europe overtook rest of the world as they do not want students to know about Jury System, lest they would demand for it.

The Jury System and the information factor

One objection often cited by anti-Jury pro-judge individuals is that Jurors have less information about the law. This objection is partly incorrect --- both jurors and judges have same information about basic concepts of justice, fairness, right/wrong etc. The one and only difference is that judges have more information about section numbers and exact length of punishment. eg both judges and Jurors know that violence is crime, a murder done with monetary motive is more heinous than spontaneous violence borne out rage and anger. But Jurors may not be aware of specific details like such act fall in section 302 such and such act carries maximum punishment of say 5 years or 7 years or 6 months and so forth. Such specific details are easy to grasp and apply.

The pro-judge anti-Jury people do not mention the other point --- i.e. judges progressively get more and more nexused, and also take bribes via relative lawyers.

The Nanavati case

The British realized long back that their own Collectors and judges were corrupt to core, and population would get crushed to the point of rebellion if their powers are not curbed. Which is why, in 1870s, British enacted Jury System in India. But in 1956, Jawaharlal Nehru and the then Supreme Court judges abolished the Jury System by citing Nanavati case as reason. This was utter nonsense.

Nanavati had killed a person named Ahuja. The Jurors had accepted that as a fact. Nanavati was a Navy officers and citizens have tremendous respect for military officers. The respect doubles when they see that a young man from wealthy family leaves posh comfortable life and accepts hard life of Military. To that, Ahuja was proven adulterer, and back then when paternity tests did not exist, adultery was considered as heinous as murder. The Jurors were in dilemma – if the convict Nanavati, the judge would hang him (which is exactly what happened in second trial). If the Jurors had power to decide the punishment, the Jurors would have surely issued some punishment like a few years of imprisonment. But Jurors had only one power --- to call him guilty which may mean his death or call him innocent. The crime of Nanavati was not motivated for economic gains, nor Nanavati was a career criminal, and surely did not deserve death for his crime out of anger. So Jurors took right decision in saving his life, and took wrong decision of “zero punishment” because they did not have powers to imprison him for a few years. Which is why in the system I have proposed, the Jurors decide punishment so that Jury is not forced by their inner conscious to give “not guilty” verdict when person is guilty not guilty enough for highest punishment that the judge might throw. So Nanavati case shows that Jurors took a very reasonable decision, and what was needed was to increase the powers of Jurors and let them decide punishments instead of judges. Despite this, Nehru (due to his feudalistic mindset) and judges canceled Jury System in India without any debate by citing one “Nanavati Trial” as reason.

Purposes of this website

1. The main purpose is to inform the citizens about the laws which can improve India and also inform the citizens about the wrong laws which are hurting India. The drafts of other important GOs we promise are on this website at All Drafts . If and when these GOs are signed by CMs/PM, they will create small changes in administration that shall solve all the problems of India that West has solved.

2. The website also contains Party's constitution and campaign structure in brief. Most of the chapters and sections of this book are jointly written by both of us authors. But some of the sections are written solely by one author, and those sections are marked accordingly. And if you like our agenda, please join our Party's Orkut Community named as Mine Royalties for Citizens

3. To ask citizens to write letter to CMs, PM to pass a Govt Order : Another important purpose of this website is to convince the citizens of India to ask and force the CMs and PM to sign a Govt Order. The description and the DRAFT of the Govt Order in chapter First Proposed Change . This Govt Order will bring one tiny change in the Indian administration, and that change will bring 100s of other small changes in and then many changes in areas of Indian administration such as police, courts, military, tax collection and would make changes in industry and economy, which would make India's technology, economy and military at par with West.

4. Culture is not the reason : One purpose of this website is to convince the fellow Indian citizens, that India's culture is NOT the reasons why India is ailing. The intellectuals have created this myth that India is ailing due to its culture, political culture etc, which also go by names of national character, moral values etc. This website has problem by problem proof, that for any problem that exists in India and not in West, culture is not even 1% of the reasons. A detailed analysis of causes of the problems in India is in the book titled as "Culture is not the reason". That book when published will be available freely from here

5. Then what are the reasons? : Another purpose of this website is to that the one and ONLY core reason why India ails is that the activists of India do NOT take interest in enacting changes in Indian administration that are less prone to nexuses and nepotism. And they keep wasting time in searching for Kalkies (good leader), Kalki Groups (good organizations), blame national character, blame culture, blame lack of moral values etc. So law that promote nepotism, nexuses stay. And so nepotism and nexus in legislatures, Ministries, IAS, IPS, judges, RBI etc is much higher than that in West. And so bad administrative procedures continue and good changes get delayed or never happen. To improve India, it is necessary and sufficient to enact changes in administration that are less prone to nepotism and nexuses. That's all -- we DO NOT need to curse culture, do not need to curse history, and do not at all need to give any moral education.
 
6. Explain why change Indian Administration is necessary : And one more purpose of this website (book) To convince the fellow Indian citizens that if we do not enact change sin administration that reduce the role of nexuses, our administration/courts will never improve. And without better courts and administration, economy, technology and military will also NOT improve. And if military does not improve, we will go the Iraq way i.e. West will devour India just as it devoured Iraq. So unless we bring changes in administration that would improve whole society as well the military, a repeat of 1757 and India becoming Iraq is imminent. In short, if Indians do not fix Indian Administration, India is going the Iraq way.

Why Right to Recall & Jury System is required

Corruption is a major concern for India and many other developing nations which impedes the countries progress. Well, it is not that the nations like the United States, U.K and other developed nations are free from the grip of corruption. These countries had also faced the same problem, but they amend the laws and regulations to minimize corruption and to some extend are successful too. So here I have prepared a draft regarding the grave issue.

Well after reading the below mentioned drafts one may feel that these regulations look good only on paper and can never be successfully implemented, then let me tell you all the below mentioned regulations are in practice in countries like USA and U.K. During my graduation in UK, I have spent 3 years in the country and found out the positives of these regulations and I personally feel that these regulations should be implemented in our country too with immediate effect and we will see the positive result. U.K and USA have faced the same problems in their developing years when they were still developing and through such regulations have been able to curb corruption to a good extent.

Government Employment
No interview, Job through only Exams Only in Government Sector.

Power to Enforce Laws
The CM, PM shall sign any proposed GO that over 50% of all citizens have approved.

Right of Publication
There should be right with police officers and with any other government officers like IAS or CBI to release any proof or evidence regarding any crime through media and internet without any higher approval. And police commissioner or minister won’t be able to fire, transfer or demote that police officer without approval of General Public as mentioned in other act.

Right to Express
Enable citizens to register YES/NO on any existing law for Rs 3/- fee at Talati’s offices. So, we can know whether general public is agreed or not.

Right to propose GO
Enable citizens to propose Govt Orders (GOs) , allow citizens to register YES/NO on proposed GOs.

Right to Replace PM, CMs, Judges
This section includes Termination policy for Ministers & Police and other Government Employees. This act enables procedures by which citizens can expel/replace CM, PM without waiting for 5 years.

There should be a power with General public to terminate any Minister, Police officer or other Government officers.

Transfer & Demotion Policy
Minister won’t be able to demote or transfer any of Government employee without General public’s concern. On the top of it, general public can transfer, demote or suspend any government employees.
 

Weekly Meetings

  Contact : Rahul Mehta
  Address : F - 104,
  Supath-2 Flats,
  Near - Juna Vadaj Bus Stand,
  Ashram Road, Ahmedabad,
  Gujarat, India
  Mobile : +91-9825127780
  You are Most Welcomed
  to attend our
  Weekly Meetings

Follow us on Twitter